NOTE: Entries on these pages contain excerpts from the news stories or external pages to which the entry is linked.

Highly Personal

    

ACLU battles FBI over ISP customer data
Lawsuit challenges right to gather information secretly
The Associated Press
Updated: 7:07 p.m. ET April 28, 2004

WASHINGTON - The American Civil Liberties Union is challenging the FBI's use of expanded powers to compel Internet service providers to turn over information about their customers or subscribers.

A lawsuit challenging secret FBI national security letters was filed April 6 in U.S. District Court in New York but not made public until Wednesday because of its extraordinary sensitivity.

The FBI can issue national security letters, or NSLs, without a judge's approval in terrorism and espionage cases. They require telephone companies, Internet service providers, banks, credit bureaus and other businesses to produce highly personal records about their customers or subscribers.

...
The ACLU lawsuit contends that the USA Patriot Act, an antiterrorism law passed shortly after the 2001 terror attacks, expanded the FBI's power to use national security letters by deleting parts of an earlier law requiring that there be some suspicion that the subject of the probe was linked to spying or terrorism.

"As a result of the Patriot Act, the FBI may now use NSLs to obtain sensitive information about innocent individuals who have no connection to espionage or terrorism," the lawsuit says.
...
The lawsuit contends that NSLs are unconstitutional because of the gag order, because a recipient has no way of challenging their validity and because the government is not forced to justify its reasons for not notifying the target about the records being sought.
...
President Bush has been pushing Congress to renew all of the Patriot Act before it expires next year, arguing that it is one of law enforcement's best tools in preventing another catastrophic terrorist attack

» MSNBC - ACLU battles FBI over ISP customer data

Excerpt made on Tuesday June 01, 2004 at 01:12 AM



This discussion has been closed. No more comments may be added.

« « BACK TO MAIN  |  Entry Index